I’m thinking the answer is “it depends.”  Like everything in this world you need to do your homework before trusting a source.  Whether you are in an online critique group or one that meets face-to-face it’s nice to know who you are dealing with.

Even critique groups that are sponsored by a writers organization can have it’s share of stinkers.  I’ve been in an online group and in a couple of in person groups and they both have their advantages and disadvantages.  Generally a good group will have “rules” to critique by.

One of the rules I espire to includes pointing out the things in the story that work and don’t JUST dwell on what doesn’t.  If you’ve ever had one of the latter you know why it’s so important – writing is very personal and criticism needs to be constructive – not destructive.  I’ve nearly been reduced to tears, so I know how it feels to have your work torn apart.

We writers need a thick skin, but the really beneficial critique is one that motivates you.  If you suspect that one of your critique group doesn’t fully support that plan, then take their advice with care.  I find that if several people feel that something works well I don’t change it. But if there are questions or concerns about an aspect of the story that multiple people point out – well, then it definitely should be reviewed.  Trust your gut. If it sounds right, change it. If it sounds wonky, then thank them for their input – but ultimately it is your work.

I’ve learned from most all of the critiques I’ve gotten, even if it is that I don’t always agree. Everyone’s critique is filtered through experience and emotion and while the former is very valuable, the latter is very unpredictible.

Enjoy the writing journey.  -BD